Student Assembly

Whereas, according to CUPD statistics, there were 5 instances of forcible sexual attacks in 2009 including 4 on the Cornell campus, Cornell students, in particular women, could use an extra layer of protection on their commute to and from campus.

Whereas, Section 265.20 of the New York State Penal Law permits the possession of pocket sized self-defense spray devices (pepper spray), which contains and releases a chemical or organic substance that is intended to produce temporary physical discomfort for the use of self-defense as justified by Article 35 of the law.

Whereas, the device has been shown to be an effective and easy-to-use protection against attack.

Whereas, Cornell University currently bans carrying pepper spray on campus, making it impossible for a student to legally carry the spray during the commute.

Whereas, the device only has a temporary, harmless effect and does not cause permanent damage.

Whereas, the device is created for and would only be authorized for self-defense purposes and any misuse of the device would be grounds for punishment.

Be it therefore resolved, that the Student Assembly recognizes the carry of pepper spray solely for self-defense purposes and requests that the University rescind its policy concerning this particular issue.

Respectfully submitted,

Konstantin Drabkin ‘11
2009–2010 Chairman, Cornell College Republicans

Ray Mensah ‘11
At-Large Representative
Student Assembly Executive Vice President